Baumer Hubner EEX GP0.2L-4 EEX GP0,2L-4 Tachogenerator ATEX voltage 60 mV per 1000 RPM Ex-approved by ATEX

EEX GP0.2L-4 Tachogenerator

Tachogenerator / Tacho
EX approval ATEX II 2 G Ex d e IIC T6 Gb
Solid shaft ø11 mm or ø14 mm with EURO flange B10 REO444
Compatible with all DC Drives from Siemens SIMOREG to Parker 590 590+

Features:
–Tachogenerator / ATEX
–Ex-approved by ATEX II 2 G Ex d e IIC T6 Gb
–Low response time
–Open circuit voltage 20…150 mV per rpm (EEx GP0,2)
–Solid shaft ø11 mm (EEx GP 0,2) or ø14 mm (TG 74 d)
–EURO flange B10
–High signal quality due to patented LongLife technology

List Price: £1,900.00 +VAT +Shipping
SKU: EEx GP 0,2
MPN: EEx GP 0,2, TG 74 d
Weight: 3.8 kg

Description

Tachogenerator / Tacho
EX approval ATEX II 2 G Ex d e IIC T6 Gb
Solid shaft ø11 mm or ø14 mm with EURO flange B10 REO444
Compatible with all DC Drives from Siemens SIMOREG to Parker 590 590+

Features:
–Tachogenerator / ATEX
–Ex-approved by ATEX II 2 G Ex d e IIC T6 Gb
–Low response time
–Open circuit voltage 20…150 mV per rpm (EEx GP0,2)
–Solid shaft ø11 mm (EEx GP 0,2) or ø14 mm (TG 74 d)
–EURO flange B10
–High signal quality due to patented LongLife technology

 

Recent Posts

Safety Scanner Issues and EN999

Optima were recently asked to advise on a safety guarding application for one of our customers. 

There had been a number of false trips of the laser scanner causing the machine to stop. As a result of this, a plastic chain ‘barrier’ had been fitted as a temporary measure with instructions to operators to not breach the barrier whilst the machine was running. 

The customer naturally wanted this rectifying as soon as possible, so Optima performed a short-notice service visit to site.

On the site visit, our engineer noted that the scanner was showing a code which indicated that the front screen required cleaning.

Once the screen was cleaned thoroughly the scanner did not show any faults or errors and was in normal run mode.

However, we performed further checks on the original software to ensure that the scanner configuration still met the requirements of the safety guarding application. 

The diagrams to the left show the Warning Field configuration (Yellow) and the Protective Field (Red). Both of these were confirmed to be operational. 

The warning field causes the klaxon to operate and the protective field caused an emergency stop of the machine.

We did, however find a few concerns that needed to be addressed.

1. None of the scanner safety circuit had been documented on any drawings.

2. Non-compliance with EN999 ‘Safety of machinery – the positioning of protective equipment in respect of approach speeds of parts of the human body’ includes a formula to be used to calculate the distance from a hazard that a safety zone must be triggered. Based on the stopping times of the machine, the scanner was placed too close to the machine to be effective in an emergency.

We are working closedly with our customer to assist them with this application and help them achieve a safe and effective solution to this.

If you need any support with safety applications or other upgrades, please get in touch.

  1. Parker SSD Microtach Replacements Leave a Reply
  2. Accelerate your digital and sustainability transformation at Siemens Transform 2024 Leave a Reply
  3. Optima’s Solution Partner Accreditation for 2024 Leave a Reply
  4. Cloud-based data dashboards Leave a Reply
  5. Siemens Transform Event Leave a Reply
  6. Rockwell Extended Warranties Leave a Reply
  7. S88 Solution Solves Obsolescence Issue Leave a Reply
  8. Up to 5 Years Warranty as Standard on our Motor and Drive Upgrades with Siemens Leave a Reply
  9. Optima achieve accreditation by Avetta for supplier competency Leave a Reply